HQ Solutions automates digital and physical workflow for businesses. Experience on both sides of the problem: manufacturing operations where the work is physical, and software development where the work is data. Most bottlenecks live where those two meet.
| No. | Discipline | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Manufacturing operations | Vendor management, speed / quality / cost optimization |
| 02 | Software development | User input to validated data to actionable reporting |
| 03 | Analysis methods | Failure mode analysis and process improvement analysis |
| 04 | AI-assisted workflow | Task automation that shortens the work in front of the user |
The tool your process actually needs, instead of the spreadsheet it has outgrown. Input capture, validation rules, and reports people act on rather than export and ignore.
ERP, MES and the machines on the floor, connected through APIs so a number is entered once and everything downstream agrees with it.
Availability, performance and quality measured from the source, so throughput conversations start from the same figures on the floor and in the office.
A working version early, on the real process with real data, so the decision to build the full system is made on evidence rather than a proposal.
Automation projects usually stall at a handoff: the software vendor does not know how the line runs, and the equipment vendor does not touch the data. Working both sides removes that seam.
Manufacturing experience working vendors, and optimizing for speed, quality and cost. Failure mode analysis and process improvement analysis are the working methods: find where the process breaks, quantify what it costs, then change the step rather than the symptom.
Software development experience automating from user input, to data validation, to actionable reports for users, as well as automating tasks using AI to speed up user workflow. The result is fewer manual touches between something happening and someone being able to act on it.
Small and mid-size manufacturers where plant and operations leaders own the outcome, operations and IT directors at larger firms, and product teams that need embedded and software work carried by the same person.
A short description of the process and where it slows down is enough to start. If it is not something I should take on, I will say so and point you somewhere better.